"Letters to Editors" undoubtedly supply a very effective and feasible way for overseas practitioners to clarify the truth. First of all, let us take the United States as an example. There are many different newspapers. Nearly every little town has one to two newspapers. Every university also has its own journals or magazines. They represent the media of the mainstream society, and receive a lot of public attention. We should make full use of this ready-made channel, which is free, saves time, and is widespread for minimal efforts. Additionally, those who read the "Letters to Editors", are often concerned with some issues, and would really like to know more or even play some role, making "Letters to Editors" highly effective. The readers often discuss with friends and family, so the ideas will reach even further. These letters tend to be published very quickly, which is an important advantage. If the topic is attractive to readers, and it is well written, the editors generally make no significant changes. For example, the case of Charles Li is one of the best current topics. Some editors even ask for an update and will feature follow-ups. This creates a convenient way for us to build co-operative relationships with the media. Reports from journalists, on the other hand, take much longer, since the reporters have to understand, verify and select the featured topics, making it nearly impossible for small town newspapers to get specialised information. Writing letters to editors as readers relieves these aspects and they shoulder no responsibility except for publishing it.
There are many examples of successful "Letters to Editors" to clarify the truth. In 2002, when the newly assigned spokesperson of the Chinese Consulate in Chicago attacked Dafa and defamed the Chicago practitioners' peaceful appeal in front of the Chinese Consulate in a local newspaper, several practitioners from Mid-Western States wrote letters to this newspaper to expose the lies and falsehood from different perspectives. Many local American residents also wrote to the editors to denounce the spokesperson' speech. It formed a very strong righteous field, resisting the evil with mighty strength.
We would like to share the following summary of our experience.
1. We should not have the attachment of fear in not being able to write well. When we write from our hearts, it will surely touch other's hearts.
2. The theme should arouse the public's attention, but our wording should not go to the extreme. When the editors agree to publish it, they generally give it an attractive title. Considering people's different levels of understanding of Falun Gong, it is good to add a simple explanation that Falun Gong is a traditional Chinese cultivation practise, believing in the principles of "Truthfulness, Compassion, Forbearance".
3. Due to space limitations, we should concentrate on one point rather than trying to cover many points.
In my understanding, the best current topic for writing letters to editors is American Citizen Charles Li's arrest and persecution in China. The American public is very concerned about those persecuted, and shows a strong response to the illegal detention and torture. Charles Li has made a tremendous sacrifice to create this precious chance for overseas practitioners to clarify the truth. Let us treasure this opportunity and our fellow practitioner's great sacrifice and pick up our pens to clarify the truth more widely, reaching every sentient being, and expedite the rescue of our fellow practitioners.
* * *
You are welcome to print and circulate all articles published on Clearharmony and their content, but please quote the source.