Jiang Zemin, China's dictator, has persecuted Falun Gong for five years.
Five years ago, about 100 million Chinese citizens lost their freedom of belief overnight.
Today, five years later, there have been over 1,000 verified deaths of Falun Gong practitioners due to the persecution. And at least 6,000 practitioners have been detained in jails all over China and over 100,000 practitioners have been detained in forced labour camps. Countless practitioners have been beaten, punished physically, and extorted financially by those who are supposed to be protectors of the law. In the five years of persecution, not only have lots of Falun Gong practitioners been beaten to death, beaten to injury, forced to leave their jobs, imposed with heavy fines, had their families broken apart, and forced into homelessness; even their family members, their good friends, and colleagues have been implicated too.
After I listed the persecution figures above, now I want say that the Chinese Government has never officially banned Falun Gong, not even for one day!
Let's briefly review what happened around that July five years ago to see if the Chinese Government has ever banned Falun Gong or not.
On April 23rd 1999, policemen in Tianjin City beat up practitioners who were doing the Falun Gong exercises and illegally arrested 45 of them. That event caused about 10,000 Falun Gong practitioners to go to the Appeals Office of the State Department in Beijing to appeal on April 25th. After the appealing practitioners were interviewed by the Prime Minister, Mr. Zhu Rongji, and they heard that the detained Falun Gong practitioners in Tianjin had been released, all the appealing practitioners peacefully left.
The event seemed have been resolved properly. Two day later on April 27th the director of the Appeals Bureau of the State Department gave a speech to a reporter from Xinhua News Agency and said: "We will not persecute Falun Gong."
However, as a matter of fact, on the night of April 25th, Jiang Zemin, who was then top Party chief, head of the military and president of the country, sent official letters to all the standing committee members of the Politbureau and other top officials, highly critical of Falun Gong. On June 7th Jiang gave a speech at the meeting of the Politbureau and described his view of Falun Gong from a political viewpoint. He claimed that Falun Gong had a profound political background and an international background. He also claimed that the April 25th appeal was the most serious political event since the June 4th Tiananmen Student Movement of 1989. Later, this speech was passed down inside the Chinese Communist Party as a secret document.
On June 10th under Jiang's control the so-called Central Falun Gong Issue Management Leading Group was established. This is the notorious "6-10 office"1. Afterwards, it was renamed as the Management Office Against Cults to deceive the public.
Jiang's arrangement to eradicate Falun Gong set was thereby set into motion, but it was still in the preparation stage and was limited to within the Communist Party. So it shouldn't be counted as the Chinese Government banning Falun Gong.
On June 14th the Central Government Appeals Office and the Appeals Office of the State Department together published an announcement over Xinhua News Agency. It mentioned: "Many Falun Gong practitioners are gossipping that 'the police will start persecuting Falun Gong.' That is totally fabricated, a demagogic rumour. People have the right to believe and practice Qigong2 and also have the freedom not to believe in Qigong."
On July 13th to pacify the Falun Gong practitioners, the Central Committee of the CCP published a leading article in the People's Daily saying: "Practising Qigong is not superstition and improving health doesn't break the law."
But only one week later, on the morning of July 20, in 30 provinces and in cities all over the country, a unified action was carried out. Local Falun Gong instructors were simultaneously rounded up and arrested. The people making the arrests didn't follow any due legal process in doing so. Later on, most of those practitioners were sentenced to jail terms of various lengths. In other words, on July 20th a gang calling themselves "Protectors of the law" arrested many citizens without any legal grounds. They set up clandestine tribunals and sent the practitioners to jail. The reason I said they didn't have any legal grounds is that all the newly promulgated laws, rules for persecuting Falun Gong, had not been put into place at that time.
So on July 22nd the Civil Administration Bureau made an announcement banning the Falun Dafa Research Association. Could this announcement be counted as the Chinese Government banning Falun Gong?
No. The Falun Dafa Research Association only included some coordinating persons like Wang Zhiwen, Li Chang, Yao Jie, and a few others. The overwhelming majority of Falun Gong practitioners were not members of the association. So this announcement couldn't be counted as banning the freedom of practising Falun Gong by all Falun Gong practitioners. Also, the Civil Administration Bureau is not a legislative branch of the government. This announcement was only an administrative regulation without legal effect.
On July 22nd there was another announcement, the "6 restraints" issued by the Public Security Department. It forbade anyone from practising Falun Gong in a public situation, forbade anyone from appealing for the Falun Gong issue, and forbade anyone from spreading Falun Gong, etc. Similarly this announcement didn't ban Falun Gong.
First, this announcement totally violated the Chinese Constitution that guarantees freedom of belief, association, and assembly. The Constitution also guarantees that Chinese citizens have the right to appeal and to defend themselves. The Constitution is the fundamental law of China. The announcement from the Public Security Department violates the Constitution, so it doesn't have any legal effect.
Secondly, the Public Security Department is not legislative, so it doesn't have the right to issue laws. Outside China, this would be the equivalent of the police making the laws! The only legislative body in China is the People's Congress. So the "6 restraints" announcement is not a law. At most, it can be counted as an administrative rule. If a person is violating an administrative rule, that person cannot be convicted of a crime, nor be sentenced to jail. At most, the person can be fined, and taken into "administrative custody". In China, the law says that one can be held under administrative custody for no more than 15 days.
Thirdly, if the authorities deem someone to be somehow related to Falun Gong, they can be arrested arbitrarily even though they are not a Falun Gong practitioner. If someone was mistakenly arrested as a Falun Gong practitioner, they can neither appeal nor lodge a complaint. If the person appeals, that would violate the rule of "forbidding anybody from appealing for any Falun Gong related issues." So the principle of this announcement is that there is no need for any reason to arrest you, and you cannot appeal. Over the past five years, there have been many non-practitioners who went to Beijing to appeal for different reasons. The most common reasons are that they were forced to leave their job, forced to relocate to allow a dam to be built, or forced to relocate to allow for new urban construction, etc. Many of them were intentionally arrested as Falun Gong practitioners because that is the simplest way to arrest people. It does not require any legal process, and the people who are arrested are not allowed to appeal. So it is guaranteed that the arrest is proper.
So this "6 restraints announcement" is only an illegal administrative rule issued by the Public Security Department under Jiang's instruction. It was an attempt to ban Falun Gong, but it doesn't have any legal effect. So the Chinese Government still has not banned Falun Gong. Saying that China banned Falun Gong is just a word game designed by Jiang.
On July 23rd 1999, the People's Daily announced that the Central Committee of the CCP decided to punish the "cult". Many people felt that the Chinese Government was banning Falun Gong. It was a pity. Although the Central Committee of the CCP made the decision, the decision still doesn't have any legal effect. In China, neither the People's Daily (a state-run newspaper) nor the Central Committee of the CCP (akin to the Cabinet in the Parliamentary system, or the Executive Branch in the US system) is legislative. They don't have the right to make laws. The Central Committee of the CCP announced that the country would be managed by following its decision. This was also announced by the People's Daily.
The headquarters of Jiang's persecution of Falun Gong is the "6-10 Office." By its nature, the "6-10 Office" is an out-and-out illegal organisation. There is no legal basis for it to exist. It is an illegal organisation established by Jiang with usurped national resources. The Chinese legal system, encompassing the Public Security system, the Procuratorate, the courts, and the existing laws are enough to handle any legal issue. The only reason the "6-10 Office" was created was to "legalise" the limitless treachery the dictator planned to commit outside the bounds of existing law.
The "610 Office" is beyond the law. As it is established, no existing laws can challenge it or stop it. China has seen such a body before. The "610 Office" is just like the "Cultural Revolution Leading Group" which allowed Chairman Mao to tear the country apart during the political campaign known as the "Great Cultural Revolution". The very existence of the "610 Office" breaks the law.
There are "610 Offices" in each administrative level from the Chinese central government to the local governments. The cost of the salaries and daily supplies of the officials in "610 offices" is equivalent to building tens of thousands of schools. This huge expense is being paid by all Chinese people.
In 1999, more than 20 years after the Cultural Revolution ended, China was working hard to recover its legal system from the sham it had become. The newly established legal system had seemingly begun to work. If a person violated the law, only that person could take the responsibility and be punished. China has a complete system of Public Security, Procuratorate, and Courts. China also has Criminal Law. Essentially, all the citizens of the Peoples Republic of China should comply with the Law, including the members of the Central Committee of CCP. But, the Law had become an unnecessary obstruction in the path of Jiang Zemin, so he founded the extra-judicial "6-10 Office."
In the past five years the "6-10 offices," under Jiang's control, have commanded and controlled each level of the Communist Party and government organisations, Public Security, Procuratorate, and Courts, labour reform system, labour education system, the national security system, and news media. It works just like the Cultural Revolution Leading Group of the Central Committee of the CCP.
The "6-10 Offices" possess absolute power. Whoever the "6-10 Office" decides to sentence or send to forced labour camp, nobody dares to ask for evidence or turn down the decision. Whatever fabricated news they decide to publish or broadcast, nobody dares to refuse. They don't dare to verify the authenticity of the news. In jails and forced labour camps, if Falun Gong practitioners are killed because they refuse to give up their belief, the killer may claim that they had the order from the "6-10 office" saying that no matter what means are used to treat Falun Gong practitioners, they cannot be held responsible for the result.
In this way, during that summer of five years ago, Jiang launched and commanded the biggest political movement since Mao's Great Cultural Revolution, establishing the "6-10 Office" and usurping China's national resources.
Notes:
1. "6-10 Office": a bureau specifically created by the Chinese government to persecute Falun Gong. It has absolute power over each level of administration in the Party, as well as over the political and judiciary branches.
2. Qigong - A form of traditional Chinese exercise which cultivates qi or “vital energy.”
* * *
You are welcome to print and circulate all articles published on Clearharmony and their content, but please quote the source.